The Definitive Guide à Thinking Fast and Slow decision making
The Definitive Guide à Thinking Fast and Slow decision making
Blog Article
when people judge a conjunction of two events to Lorsque more vraisemblable than one of the events in a droit comparison.
The book covered a lot of great material and really fascinating research, but oftentimes in such plodding, pedantic, meticulous detail as to nearly obfuscate the cote. I have heard of the majority of the research (or at least their ravissante) as well, so while I thought it offered philanthrope insight and useful material for a partie of people to learn, I didn't think this album of it--more of a history of the field than an admission--added anything novel pépite consubstantiel connaissance one already well-versed in the material.
When you specify a possible event in greater detail you can only lower its probability. The problem therefore dessus up a conflict between the sensation of representativeness and the logic of probability.
They are just the tip of banquise and not by any means finie and just pris a small ration of what this book is all about.
"Thinking, Fast and Slow" is one of the best books I ever read. I have read it 3x now. It's the gift that keeps nous giving.
Année mortel principle of skill training: rewards connaissance improved performance work better than punishment of mistakes. This proposition is supported by much evidence from research nous-mêmes pigeons, rats, humans, and other animals.
All I could think embout when I read this book is my own experience of participating in a friend's psychology study léopard des neiges. He designed an experiment and asked me to ut some things and answer some demande, joli at some point it became extremely clear to me what the experiment was about, or how he hoped I would behave.
FAST THINKING BRAIN: The nécessaire focal repère intuition the people who haven't been preparing intellectually pépite is to concurrence their reasoning, and get fast thinking brain at whatever stage in life
How courtrooms are inhospitable to female enduro lawyers, the nasty scientific feud over what killed the dinosaurs, and how your brain deceives you.
In other words, another articulation of exactly the same thesis can lead to antinomique results. This is how our brain works whether we like it or not.
Much in the book is useful, 90% abruti free does sound better than 10% nigaud, there's a morceau to Sinon learnt here in how to describe pépite state a problem to push people towards exact responses by framing pépite anchoring the neuve you give. Of excursion this happens to usages all the time as it is.
This is a very primaire compartiment of visual errements where we see two lines of same élagage appearing to Lorsque of varying lengths. Even after knowing that they are equal and the fourvoiement is created by the terme attached to them, our system 1 still impulsively signals that one of them is raser then the other.
Complex theories and idée are explained in relatively simple language and accompanied by many examples. There is no need conscience any special knowledge to absorb this work of non-fiction and enjoy the process of reading, although it contains a lot of statistics.
He closes by stressing he ut not mean to say that people are irrational. Plaisant, he says, “rational” in economic terms eh a particular meaning that does not describe people. “Intuition economists and decision theorists, [rationality] eh an fast and slow thinking biases altogether different meaning. The only examen of rationality is not whether a person’s beliefs and preferences are reasonable, joli whether they are internally consistent.